<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some of the most controversial album covers ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/</link>
	<description>the online music and audio magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-125502</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 10:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-125502</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the big deal with some of these. The 2nd one is basically a spoof of a painting and I don&#039;t see what&#039;s the problem with the 4th.

Meanwhile, I think Scorpions&#039; Virgin Killers and Blind Faith&#039;s selftitled albums have somewhat offensive covers (nude underage girls, one being seen entirely (though the vagina is hidden with something looking like a break in a glass panel) and the other seems only topless though holding a plane with a shape reminding of something else...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the big deal with some of these. The 2nd one is basically a spoof of a painting and I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s the problem with the 4th.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I think Scorpions&#8217; Virgin Killers and Blind Faith&#8217;s selftitled albums have somewhat offensive covers (nude underage girls, one being seen entirely (though the vagina is hidden with something looking like a break in a glass panel) and the other seems only topless though holding a plane with a shape reminding of something else&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clirocz</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-122286</link>
		<dc:creator>clirocz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-122286</guid>
		<description>A record i saw that wasn&#039;t put on the list of censored records is Moontan from Golden Earring with the nude girl cover.later replacement cover was a picture of an earring in an ear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A record i saw that wasn&#8217;t put on the list of censored records is Moontan from Golden Earring with the nude girl cover.later replacement cover was a picture of an earring in an ear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian James</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-121442</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-121442</guid>
		<description>I think Virgin Killer is so controversial, even this list wanted to stay away from it. It&#039;s automatically the winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Virgin Killer is so controversial, even this list wanted to stay away from it. It&#8217;s automatically the winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredagshumor: Albumcovers der var for meget af det gode &#124; Mashed Potatoes</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-119086</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredagshumor: Albumcovers der var for meget af det gode &#124; Mashed Potatoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-119086</guid>
		<description>[...] er mange flere gode historier på NoiseAddicts. L&#230;s ogs&#229;Fredagshumor: upassende annoncer fra de gode gamle dage Upassende reklamer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] er mange flere gode historier på NoiseAddicts. L&aelig;s ogs&aring;Fredagshumor: upassende annoncer fra de gode gamle dage Upassende reklamer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relevant To Your Interests #003 &#171; Gunshy</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-118782</link>
		<dc:creator>Relevant To Your Interests #003 &#171; Gunshy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-118782</guid>
		<description>[...] Got to Get Got will be in Saint John and Fredericton this weekend and I&#8217;m sofa king pumped to finally see them in the face. They appeared on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Got to Get Got will be in Saint John and Fredericton this weekend and I&#8217;m sofa king pumped to finally see them in the face. They appeared on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt searles</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-110009</link>
		<dc:creator>matt searles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-110009</guid>
		<description>What album cover was it that the PMRC got freaked out about? Something to do with a crotch if I remember correctly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What album cover was it that the PMRC got freaked out about? Something to do with a crotch if I remember correctly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carvaggio</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-108679</link>
		<dc:creator>Carvaggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-108679</guid>
		<description>Uh, Jane&#039;s Addiction... (they even had to release a second album cover)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, Jane&#8217;s Addiction&#8230; (they even had to release a second album cover)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonitorDown</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-108669</link>
		<dc:creator>MonitorDown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-108669</guid>
		<description>Good list. There are plenty of controversial album covers, way too many to list them all. I didn&#039;t even know about Electric Ladyland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list. There are plenty of controversial album covers, way too many to list them all. I didn&#8217;t even know about Electric Ladyland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: secretmuffin</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-108583</link>
		<dc:creator>secretmuffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-108583</guid>
		<description>You also left out The Coup&#039;s 2001 album showing WTC towers on fire.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also left out The Coup&#8217;s 2001 album showing WTC towers on fire.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizenx</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseaddicts.com/2009/04/30-most-controversial-album-covers/comment-page-1/#comment-108118</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizenx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noiseaddicts.com/?p=1657#comment-108118</guid>
		<description>I had no trouble buying Blind Faith here in San Diego.  As a matter of fact, I still have the album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no trouble buying Blind Faith here in San Diego.  As a matter of fact, I still have the album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
