Stevie Wonder’s Superstition clavinet part dissected

Stevie Wonder’s Superstition is definitely one of the funkiest songs on the planet – It was released way back in 1972 on the Talking Book album and climbed up the UK charts quickly. Stevie came up with the song by playing the original funky drum beat that starts the track and humming a melody over the top of it.

Superstition was originally intended for Jeff Beck as a thank you for the guitarist’s help on the awesome Talking Book album (buy CD here, download here), but when Motown heard it they released Wonder’s version as a single.

The song finally got popular in the US when Stevie toured with the Rolling Stones, thereby introducing the Stevie Wonder to a largely white audience, and grabbing Stevie’s first number one hit since 1963.

It’s of course the signature Clavinet part that just oozes the funk – In fact it was Superstition that really put the Hohner Clavinet on the map in funk/soul music. A lot of keyboard players instantly tried to cop the part, but it seemed impossible to play. Even Stevie himself never really played it properly when he played live.

It was later revealed that the Clavinet part actually consisted of two separate parts, panned hard left and right, creating the amazing polyrhythmic funk monster over which the main melody bounces. Stevie was really into synthesizer technology at the time, so the bubbling bass line was also produced by the Clavinet fed through a synthesizer.

Still, getting the Clavinet part EXACTLY right has been elusive for pretty much every keyboard player on the planet, and the exact recorded parts have been somewhat of a mystery.

Until now.

An engineer has acquired the master recordings and has dissected Stevie Wonder’s multitrack masters of the song. Through the use of Protools, he was able to isolate all the tracks to get a listen to the infamous Clavinet parts.   Ready for this? … In reality, it’s actually 8 Clavinet parts!

Pretty interesting.  It sounds like some of the grooviness is created with delays and echoes on the effect tracks.  It would have been nice to hear each part in isolation, and I’ve written to the author to try and get a copy of the sound files. I’ll update this post if I hear back from him, so please subscribe to email alerts to stay up to date.

Here’s a treat:  it’s Stevie Wonder and his band doing a smoking version of Superstition on Sesame street. I love how the one kid in the background is grooving out like crazy and all the other kids are standing there seemingly bored out of their minds.

Superstition has been covered countless times by other bands, most famously by Stevie Ray Vaughan and Jeff Beck, but Mel Torme also has a pretty interesting version of it on his Live At The Maisonette album from 1975.

In case you actually want to learn how to play the song, the sheet music is available for free [removed].  We actually did another story a while back about the Beatles & fourier transforms to figure out the parts.  Check it out here if you’re interested.

Here’s Stevie and most of the band actually recording the song:

UPDATE (Jan 6, 2012): We removed a couple of links as they appear bad now.


13 Comments »

  • lupus le fou said:

    That Sesame Street version – HOLY FREHOLES!!! I NEED that track!!! Where’s the bit torrent people?!?

  • michael said:

    Funkscribe only managed to get the masters because someone made it available through Bit Torrent. He just happened to get credit for it.

  • rob said:

    TO GET THE TORRENT DOWNLOAD azureus and then go to MININOVA.ORG to download the tracks. They come in .wav files and take a couple hours to download. Once you’re in protools, open a new session, import “audio files”, select all of the .wav files. and you’re set to go!

  • Steve Wilde said:

    You Arse… All those parts aren’t neccesarily played at all times. Multi-tracking doesn’t mean you have to always have everything in the track playing. Well done, you’ve just realised people have been over-dubbing for 30 years!

  • pirahnahead said:

    the clavinet part:…its really TWO parts..Funny though, cause this my friend is what makes it GENIUS…Each part both 1 and 2 were recorded from various outputs – and each had its own delay track. Part one (the main line which hooked us in the first place has been recorded via
    1) Amp Mic 1
    2) Amp Mic 2
    3) Direct out L (Low End)
    4) Direct out R (Hi End)
    5) Delay/Echoplex out

    But the Counter part (This is where it gets SUPER funky) was recorded the same way but without the amps.. it was DIRECT in including the Delay outs – so it consists of 3 tracks:

    1) Direct out L
    2) Direct out R
    3) Delay/Echoplex out

    Dig?

  • Instrument Etrange #3: Le Clavinet | MuZicoSphere said:

    [...] récemment, Noise Addicts rapportait une anecdote sur ce morceau énorme et sa partie de Clavinet que beaucoup ont vainement [...]

  • Editor’s Note: Things You Should Be Reading – July 2009 | Ask A Sound Guy said:

    [...] guys regularly churn out audio-nerd awesomeness.  From Eavesdropping on printers to Dissecting Stevie Wonder’s Magic Clavinet.  Anyway, awesome although not always super-practical, so I give it 4 Ben [...]

  • Producer Bear said:

    I have to agree with Steve Wilde’s comment.
    “All those parts aren’t neccesarily played at all times. Multi-tracking doesn’t mean you have to always have everything in the track playing. Well done, you’ve just realised people have been over-dubbing for 30 years!”

  • Producer Bear said:

    Nice steady tempo to the Sesame Street live version!

  • Victor White said:

    Is it imagination, or do guitar players have it ten-times over on us keyboard players when it comes to sharing skill-of-the-trade on the internet? There’s no better teacher in clav playing than Stevie Wonder…the internet should be rich with in-depth analization of his technique. So, why is it so hard to find a good tutorial online on this and most other upper-end keyboard playing techniques? Anyone want to turn me onto some good online instruction?

  • t said:

    NOT free, the document site is a scammer!

    • editor said:

      Thanks. A couple of links appear bad now. Removed links.


Leave a Comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.